Skip to main content


A couple of years ago I organized a conference session on storytelling as a means to communicate anthropological findings in non-academic environments. Storytelling is central to anthropology as a discipline—not only do we all study some aspect of human story, the stories of the cultures we study are key to our understanding of them. Stories become mechanisms for collaboration and change, as well as carriers of history. But we don’t always stop to think about the stories we tell, even though anthropologists regularly use storytelling as a communication device. In order to be relevant in settings dominated by non-anthropologists, we must not only pass on the data we have gathered, but convey its importance and convince decision makers in business, design, development, public policy, environment, and a myriad of other fields. Constructing these stories involves editing and carefully choosing what to relay to our audience. Delivering the stories involves performance on many scales and with the help of tools. Stories are told in meetings, in the media, and in the world at large, though our voices, books, and slideshows and video. Stories are transformed as they move through different groups, audiences, and media. They expose the ways in which narrative influences our view of history and can change the future, and reflect on the impact of story on both what it means to be an anthropologist and how anthropology is seen by the outside world.

The session had some great participants, and I do have intentions of putting together an edited volume...once time allows...if you have an interest let me know...


charu said…
this is very interesting... in fact, these last few days there has been a debate in some Indian blogs over how important 'anecdotes' are - as opposed to 'hard data' / statistics.... in fact, I had written about using narratives / stories in research a long while ago... do check this post out in my old blog sometime -
Alex said…
Thanks for the link Charu...I really should do something with this narrative stuff (and will keep you in the loop if I do). I suppose this is another area where my interests collide, because the landscape of Vijayanagara is also a narrative landscape, considered by many to be the location of Kishkinda and many important events in the Ramayana.
Steve Portigal said…
I'd like to learn more about your conference session.

Tom Mulhern and I tried something similar at a workshop at About, With, and For this past year. Our workshop blurb is here (scroll down about 3/4 of the page).

We hoped to get people to tell stories that had implications for an audience, rather than just relating what they found interesting. It was really really hard for most people to do - they didn't seem to get it. I think the idea of just any kind of storytelling was novel enough that to focus on a more specific type of storytelling, without a common understanding of the basic skill rendered the task too challenging. At least to get very far in a 90 minute session. I think it's a critical issue, and I hope for another opportunity to take the discussion further.
Alex said…
Steve, your workshop looks like it would have been fun, it is interesting (though maybe not suprising) that the implications got a bit lost. We have been doing a great deal at work to practice and think about effective presentations, and I think a big part of it is to know why you are saying what you are saying...what message do you want to get across.

As for my session, we presented at the American Anthropological Association meetings in Chicago in 2003. I organized it with multiple goals. It kind of began with thinking about the fact that anthropologists spend a lot of time collecting stories, but really we also spend a lot of time telling stories too, and are maybe not so aware of that part (like your participants).

Then I also wanted to grow it away from the standard academic (read dry and sometimes inaccessible) mode of presenting findings, since we are so often communicating to non-anthropologists. The presentations were a little heavy on the anthrodesign side, but included some folks from other industries, non-profit, and academia. Unfortunately, AAA stuff is not available online, but I can send you the abstracts if you would like.
Steve Portigal said…
I'd like to see the abstracts, yeah. Ideally our workshop was a prototype, and as organizers we were deep into the topic area, and thought we could quicky bring our participants up to speed and move forward, but in fact, that wasn't the case. Probably a good learning for me about facilitation in those type of settings in general...

I'm steve at portigal dot com

Dina Mehta said…
Alex, i'm facilitating a session tomorrow with a bunch of people on Youth Themes here in India .. and i plan to use storytelling as part of the session...

I'd love to read your notes sometime ... do get the volume done :):):)

Popular posts from this blog

Kids Day and India

Last Friday was bring your kid to work day at Pitney Bowes. It's all very fun, begins with breakfast and a magic show, followed by tours for the older kids, then a big outdoor picnic. I was a tour stop, "Let's Travel to India." They put the kids in groups by age, since some of the stops are better for older or younger ones...I ended up with groups ranging from about 8-13 years old. It was fun but exhausting.

I figured the point was more fun than educational, so pretty much I set up a slide show to talk about the fact that we invent stuff by understanding how people live and work, and asking what they knew about India. Answers: lots of people, cows...Showed them pics of cellphones, malls and offices and lots of things that look pretty similar in India as in the US, then pictures of things that look different. Fun to see their reactions. They all noticed the Subway in the mall, and they all recognized the well in the village and understood what it was for and that…

To Label or Not to Label?

Blogger now not only allows me to tag my posts (that's label in google talk for some reason), but I can display for all my readers the labels and how often I have used them. For now I have added that widget (see right side of the screen).

At first, I thought I would go back to all my old posts and tag them (maybe I still will). Then it seemed daunting. Then I worried about being somewhat consistent in my tagging, so that a reader could clearly see that I write a lot about anthropology, or social media. But then I looked at my posts and realized I actually write about a lot of different things. So if I start labeling, do I end up with just a long list of tags? Or do I then feel a need to constrain what I write about to a defined set of categories?

I realize blogs with a theme are powerful...and I think I have some themes running through here...interspersed with random thoughts or items that catch my interest.

What to do? Does it matter? Is there meaning in tags (beyond the mea…

Anthropology and advertising?

I read an interesting article on trend forecasting today. I've always found this fascinating (and wonder how much anybody checks later to see if the forecasters were right). The only thing that bothered me about this one, and this is not new, is the claim that what they do is like cultural anthropology. This is not a diss on advertising, marketing, trend forecasting, or any of the other fields that claim to be like anthropology--these folks to interesting work.

I am just annoyed at the claim itself. Granted, we anthropologists are not always good at advertising that we offer a holistic approach, and theoretical insight based on our training. So anybody who observes people is now an anthropologist. Or is it just that Americans are so used to sound bites that they don't understand the nuanced differences in anything?